Google Hates Links Pages


Many small business websites have a links page. Links pages are simply a web page full of links to other websites. These became popular a few years ago as a way of creating reciprocal links with friends and other businesses in an attempt to boost website visitor numbers (traffic) from those sites.

Not satisfied with the amount of extra traffic these links provided, people then began joining link exchange schemes where they had access to many more reciprocal links. Often these exchange schemes created reciprocal links between two websites that had no relevance to each other at all. For example, a reciprocal link between a beauty therapist and a building company.

Some years ago, directly because of this behaviour, Google decided that link schemes were a bad idea. (Remember that Google’s whole business model is built on the concept of relevance).

Google’s policy on link schemes is very clear – don’t do it.

So what you should ask yourself before linking to other sites is this: “If search engines didn’t exist and the amount of website traffic I got was irrelevant to me, would I still create this link?”

If the answer is yes, then the link probably adds value to your website, so go ahead and create the link.

If the answer is no, then don’t create the link.

Also bear in mind that the website you are linking to needs to add value to your website. So if your link is to a website that creates spam, downloads malware or engages in illegal practices like phishing, Google will take a very dim view of your website indeed and list it accordingly.

Above all, remember that in general, links pages are in violation of Google’s webmaster guidelines, so if you have a links page on your website, go and review it today. 

 

Related posts:

  1. Inbound Links: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
  2. How to Submit Your Website URL to the Search Engines
  3. Get Into Bed with Google
  4. The 6 Golden Rules of Website Design
  5. Choosing a Domain Name

Tags: Google, Google Friendly, Google Webmaster Guidelines, Link Exchanges, Link Farms, Links, Marketing, Online Marketing, search engines, Websites

About

Steve is the owner of Small Business Marketing, which is based in North Norfolk in the UK. He is passionate about helping small business owners to improve their web presence and their understanding of how the Internet works. He believes that by doing so, they will improve their businesses.

http://www.small-businessmarketing.co.uk

  • http://www.metalfrogstudios.com Chris Wheeler

    Hi Steve
    Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Thanks for clarifying your position. We have run many bench tests between Bing,Yahoo and Google, and the Google search is the worst one for giving ersturns which don’t match search exactly in the top 10. You are right Google does have the lions share, and it is true to day that you don’t “bing” something you “google it”. I even have clients who use Yahoo and will stil say they are going to Google it!
    I just think that algorithm changes from Google are wild and unpredictable and this could be improved. Google may argue that because of the numbers involved it is impossible to get everything right, but I just wish they would stop working on gimmicks like instatnt, and concentrate on pure search results.

    • http://www.small-businessmarketing.co.uk Steve Bunyan

      Hi Chris,

      I take your point about Google, but isn’t it fair to say that if someone is running a business, then surely the ‘best’ search engine (for them) is the one that delivers the most targeted traffic? Would you disagree?

      Kind regards,

      Steve

  • http://www.metalfrogstudios.com/ Chris Wheeler

    Hi Steve,
    I am not sure I entirely agree with everything in your article. Google looks at quality and relevance (you did mention relevance), but other engines look at other factors. With over 11 years SEO experience, we have seen Google change its mind on a number of different issues and had many a heated debate with Matt on the subject.However, what needs to be taken in to account is that Google is not the only search engine and it is equally not the best one, so if you disregard policies from other engines then you could do so at your peril. I was at an SEO Consultants conference in San Francisco last year and the subject of quantitative link building came up. Google’s answer was that providing the exchange was quality and that you had not paid for the reciprocal link then there was nothing to stop the algorithm from indexing the term from the link.

    • http://www.small-businessmarketing.co.uk Steve Bunyan

      Hi Chris,
      Thank you for a great comment; you make some really good points. I should perhaps explain that I am not for one minute suggesting that anyone should ignore quality, but this is just one blog post and it cannot cover everything. I find your point that Google is not the best search engine fascinating – best based upon what? I certainly agree it is not the only search engine, but it does have the lion’s share of search engine traffic. Again, I agree with your point about quantitative link building, but this post is about links pages, not individual links. I’d love to hear more from you about why you say Google is not the best search engine.
      Kind regards,
      Steve